• Users Online: 173
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 Table of Contents  
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 195-197

Case of Takayasu Arteritis

Shrikrishna Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission23-Feb-2019
Date of Decision28-Mar-2019
Date of Acceptance02-May-2019
Date of Web Publication18-Dec-2019

Correspondence Address:
Rajesh Krishnachandra Shah
Shrikrishna Hospital, 223, Samarthnagar, Aurangabad - 431 001, Maharashtra
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jiae.jiae_7_19

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Shah RK. Case of Takayasu Arteritis. J Indian Acad Echocardiogr Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;3:195-7

How to cite this URL:
Shah RK. Case of Takayasu Arteritis. J Indian Acad Echocardiogr Cardiovasc Imaging [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Aug 14];3:195-7. Available from: http://www.jiaecho.org/text.asp?2019/3/3/195/273308

A 23-year-old female was referred for hypertension. She complained of occasional uneasiness and restlessness. She had a 2-year-old child with normal delivery. No history of preeclampsia or any history of hypertension was reported.

General examination revealed a high blood pressure of 210/110 mmHg in both the upper extremities and a feeble pulse in the lower extremities. She had no signs of heart failure. Her cardiovascular examination showed a systolic murmur all over the precordium, which was not conducted to the carotids. The carotids were well palpated. There was a bruit over the epigastrium. All other systems were normal.

Her X-ray showed mild cardiomegaly [Figure 1].
Figure 1: X-ray chest posteroanterior view

Click here to view

2D echocardiography showed left ventricular hypertrophy, normal other chambers [Videos 1 and 2]. The aorta was normal, with aortic root being 30 mm and the ascending aorta being 32 mm [Figure 2]. The aortic valve was tricuspid with normal leaflets showing normal coaptation [Video 3].
Figure 2: Aortic measurement

Click here to view

Color Doppler showed no regurgitation or stenosis of any valves. The aortic root and arch and arch vessels appeared normal [Video 4]. In the subcostal examination thoracoabdominal aortic flow was blunted and not pulsatile as routinely seen [Videos 5 and 6], with a diastolic gradient of 6 mmHg [Figure 3], giving a clue to a proximal obstruction. Hence, computed tomography (CT) angiogram was recommended.
Figure 3: Thoracoabdominal pulsed wave Doppler spectrum

Click here to view

CT angiogram was done which showed mildly dilated aortic root, and ascending aorta, with multiple stenotic lesions all along the thoracic and abdominal aorta [Figure 4] and [Figure 5], particularly proximal to the renal arteries [Figure 6], explaining the cause of severe hypertension. The echocardiography is known to underestimate the aortic measurements as much as 20 mm, as compared to CT measurements explaining the lower aortic measurements obtained here.[1] This is also because in echo the measurements are in one orthogonal plane. The aorta was irregularly thickened at multiple places with normal arch arteries. There was significant luminal narrowing postrenal artery before the bifurcation.
Figure 4: Computed tomography scan of arch and descending aorta

Click here to view
Figure 5: Computed tomography scan lateral view of the whole aorta

Click here to view
Figure 6: Computed tomography scan of the descending aorta and renal arteries

Click here to view

  Introduction Top

The disease gets its name after Professor Takayasu, an ophthalmologist at Kanazawa University, Japan. Takayasu arteritis is a well-known yet rare form of large-vessel vasculitis.[2] Takayasu arteritis is also known as pulseless disease, occlusive thromboaortopathy, and Martorell syndrome, wherein there is a chronic inflammatory arteritis affecting large vessels, predominantly the aorta and its main branches. The vessel inflammation leads to wall thickening, fibrosis, stenosis, and thrombus formation.[3] It has now been recognized worldwide in both sexes. The disease commonly presents in the 2nd or 3rd decade of life, often with a delay in diagnosis from the onset of first symptom, of months to years. Manifestations range from asymptomatic disease found as a result of impalpable pulses or bruits to catastrophic neurological impairment. A two-stage process has been suggested with a “prepulseless” phase characterized by nonspecific inflammatory features, followed by a chronic phase with the development of vascular insufficiency, in some cases accompanied by intermittent flares, although not all patients conform to this pattern.[4]

  Histopathology Top

Macroscopically, in the chronic phase, the aorta is thickened secondary to fibrosis of all three vessel layers. The lumen is narrowed in a patchy distribution, often affecting multiple areas. If disease progression is rapid, fibrosis can be inadequate with subsequent aneurysm formation. The intima may be ridged, with a “tree bark” appearance, a feature common to many aortitides.[5]

  Diagnosis Top

From the more typical features of Takayasu arteritis, the American College of Rheumatology defined specific diagnostic criteria for this disorder in 1990.[6] The different criteria considered were:

  1. Age at the disease onset <40 years
  2. Claudication of extremities
  3. Decreased brachial artery pulse
  4. Blood pressure difference >10 mmHg
  5. Bruit over subclavian arteries of aorta
  6. Arteriogram abnormalities.

If at least three out of the six criteria were present, it was enough for the diagnosis of Takayasu arteritis.[6]

The differential diagnoses include other causes of large-vessel vasculitis as follows:

(1) Inflammatory aortitis (syphilis, tuberculosis, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthropathies, Behcet's disease, Kawasaki disease, and giant-cell arteritis); (2) developmental abnormalities (coarctation of the aorta and Marfan's syndrome), and (3) other aortic pathologies, such as ergotism and neurofibromatosis.

Most of these have specific features that enable diagnosis, but tuberculosis has remained an important differential and possible etiological factor.[2]

  Classification Top


An attempt has been made to classify the disease on the basis of angiographic findings.[6] These findings are from Type 1 to Type I as follows:

  1. Branches from the aortic arch
  2. IIa Ascending aorta, aortic arch and its branches
  3. IIb Ascending aorta, aortic arch and its branches, thoracic descending aorta
  4. Type III Thoracic descending aorta, abdominal aorta and/or renal arteries
  5. Type IV Abdominal aorta and/or renal arteries
  6. Type V Combined features of types IIb and IV.

They have even extended the classification to coronary and pulmonary arteries, and if they are involved, they are represented as C(+) or P(+).

Type V is the most common finding, and Type IV is observed in India and Thailand but is very rare in the United States and Japan.[7] Hence, our case falls in the Type III variety, involving the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta with the renal arteries.


Ishikawa defined clinical groups based on the natural history and complications of the disease. Four grades of disease are described [Table 1].[8] The four most important complications were defined as Takayasu retinopathy, secondary hypertension, aortic regurgitation, and aneurysm formation, each being graded as mild/moderate or severe at the time of diagnosis. The experience from India supports this classification for prognostic assessment.[9]
Table 1: Ishikawa classification of Takayasu arteritis

Click here to view


Currently, the best evidence-based treatments include steroids, to which 50% respond, and methotrexate to which a further 50% respond.[2]

  Conclusion Top

The reason to present this case is that, in every case, the abdominal aorta should be examined with color flow mapping and interrogated by pulsed wave Doppler, so as not to miss such an important proximal obstructive condition, which may not be seen in other transthoracic views.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

  References Top

Plonek T, Berezowski M, Bochenek M, Filip G, Rylski B, Golesworthy T, et al. A comparison of aortic root measurements by echocardiography and computed tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019;157:479-86.  Back to cited text no. 1
Johnston SL, Lock RJ, Gompels MM. Takayasu arteritis: A review. J Clin Pathol 2002;55:481-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
Lupi-Herrera E, Sánchez-Torres G, Marcushamer J, Mispireta J, Horwitz S, Vela JE. Takayasu's arteritis. Clinical study of 107 cases. Am Heart J 1977;93:94-103.  Back to cited text no. 3
Hall S, Barr W, Lie JT, Stanson AW, Kazmier FJ, Hunder GG. Takayasu arteritis. A study of 32 North American patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 1985;64:89-99.  Back to cited text no. 4
Gravanis MB. Giant cell arteritis and Takayasu aortitis: Morphologic, pathogenetic and etiologic factors. Int J Cardiol 2000;75 Suppl 1:S21-33.  Back to cited text no. 5
Arend WP, Michel BA, Bloch DA, Hunder GG, Calabrese LH, Edworthy SM, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of Takayasu arteritis. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:1129-34.  Back to cited text no. 6
Moriwaki R, Noda M, Yajima M, Sharma BK, Numano F. Clinical manifestations of Takayasu arteritis in India and Japan – New classification of angiographic findings. Angiology 1997;48:369-79.  Back to cited text no. 7
Ishikawa K. Natural history and classification of occlusive thromboaortopathy (Takayasu's disease). Circulation 1978;57:27-35.  Back to cited text no. 8
Subramanyan R, Joy J, Balakrishnan KG. Natural history of aortoarteritis (Takayasu's disease). Circulation 1989;80:429-37.  Back to cited text no. 9


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]

  [Table 1]


Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  In this article
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded44    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal