• Users Online: 399
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 12-16

Trans-esophageal echocardiography during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting


1 Department of Anesthesiology, Fortis Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Anesthesia, Terna Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Web Publication15-Mar-2019

Correspondence Address:
T A Patil
Department of Anesthesiology, Fortis Hospital, Cunningham Road, Bengaluru - 560 052, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jiae.jiae_38_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) is fast becoming widely adopted technique for surgical revascularization of the heart. However, OPCABG presents with unique technical and hemodynamic challenges which require additions to conventional monitoring techniques. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) provides reliable and real-time information to monitor these challenges during OPCABG. TEE is an invaluable diagnostic tool for real-time imaging during OPCABG. It is beneficial not only in the intraoperative period but also in the postoperative care units for better patient outcomes.

Keywords: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, regional wall motion abnormalities, transesophageal echocardiography


How to cite this article:
Patil T A, Ambli SK, Badge VS. Trans-esophageal echocardiography during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Indian Acad Echocardiogr Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;3:12-6

How to cite this URL:
Patil T A, Ambli SK, Badge VS. Trans-esophageal echocardiography during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Indian Acad Echocardiogr Cardiovasc Imaging [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Sep 15];3:12-6. Available from: http://www.jiaecho.org/text.asp?2019/3/1/12/254256


  Introduction Top


Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) is fast becoming widely adopted technique for surgical revascularization of the heart. However, OPCABG presents with unique technical and hemodynamic challenges which require additions to conventional monitoring techniques. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) provides reliable and real-time information to monitor these challenges during OPCABG.

Routine TEE during cardiac surgery has shown to reduce patient morbidity and mortality and improve patient outcome.[1] It is beneficial in high-risk patients undergoing CABG. Savage et al. have shown that TEE changed surgical management in 57% and anesthetic management in 73% of CABG patients.[2] Skinner et al. and Klein et al. have also shown that preoperative studies alone may not accurately reflect patient pathology due to inadequacies of transthoracic echo, an inaccurate or incomplete report, and/or disease progression.[3],[4]

Assessment during OPCABG can be conveniently divided into three phases as assessment before grafting, during grafting, and after grafting. Assessment before grafting should be focused on the primary pathology, but a comprehensive study should be completed in all patients. Baseline assessment of cardiac function before grafting by TEE provides vital information to formulate and manage hemodynamics during OPCABG. It also provides a template with which further assessments can be compared. However, assessment after grafting is solely focused on assessing the results and complications of OPCABG.


  Assessment Before Grafting Top


Systolic function – Global and regional wall motion abnormalities

Assessment of global and regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMAs) is vital in patients undergoing OPCABG. In 2002, the American Heart Association (AHA) Writing Group recommended a 17-segment model for regional wall assessment of the left ventricle (LV) [Figure 1]. This model divides the LV myocardial mass into basal, mid-cavity, and apical thirds.[5] The 17 segments of the LV can be visualized by TEE by 6 views at mid-esophageal (ME) and transgastric (TG) levels. These views provide adequate information to accomplish regional assessment of LV systolic function.
Figure 1: A 17-segment model as proposed by the American Heart Association 2002 with coronary distribution. Basal segments: (1) Basal anterior, (2) basal anterolateral, (3) basal inferolateral, (4) basal inferior, (5) basal inferoseptal, (6) basal anteroseptal mid-segments, (7) mid-anterior, (8) mid-anterolateral, (9) mid-inferolateral, (10) mid-inferior, (11) mid-inferoseptal, (12) mid-anteroseptal apical segments, (13) apical anterior, (14) apical lateral, (15) apical inferior, (16) apical septal, and (17) apical cap. LAD: Left anterior descending, RCA: Right coronary artery, LCX: Left circumflex, ME: Mid esophageal, TG: Trans gastric

Click here to view


Assessment of global LV systolic function predicts the outcome after OPCABG. It also guides the choice of inotropes, requirement of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), and viability of off-pump technique.

Diastolic function

Diastolic dysfunction is the earliest indicator of ischemia. Impaired relaxation of the segment involved is the earliest change detected by TEE. It may progress to pseudo-normalization with worsening ischemia. Advanced stages of diastolic dysfunction are predictive of poor long-term prognosis.[6]

Mitral valve assessment

Assessment of mitral valve for ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is of importance considering its impact on the surgical decision. Tomographic planes to assess mitral valve are ME 4-chamber, ME 2-chamber, ME commissural, ME long-axis (LAX) and TG basal short-axis (SAX) views. Assessment of severity of mitral regurgitation (MR) by TEE can be inaccurate in an anesthetized patient.[7] However, the preoperative hemodynamics can be replicated by optimizing the loading conditions with the use of vasoconstrictors. TEE can be utilized to demonstrate the mechanism and consequences of associated MR which can guide the choice of surgical procedure.

Assessment of the aorta

OPCABG requires manipulation of the aorta for proximal anastomosis by partial clamping. In the presence of severe aortic atheromas, these manipulations can result in increased incidence of stroke. TEE helps to identify, locate, and grade atheromas to make necessary modifications in the surgical procedure. TEE can visualize most of the thoracic aorta except for distal ascending aorta and proximal arch as imaging is affected by overlying trachea and left main bronchus.[8] ME aortic LAX and SAX, upper esophageal aortic arch SAX and LAX, and descending thoracic SAX and LAX views can be utilized to visualize thoracic aorta.

Assessment for coexisting abnormalities by comprehensive examination

Apart from performing the focused assessment, it is necessary to evaluate the heart for coexisting abnormalities. AHA has recommended 28 TEE views for comprehensive assessment.[9] Identification of coexisting abnormalities such as atrial septal defects and valvular lesions may necessitate alterations in the surgical procedure being performed.


  Assessment during Grafting Top


Technically, OPCAB surgery differs drastically from that of conventional CABG as the grafts are placed on a beating heart. Positioning of the heart to facilitate grafting on the posterior vessels is referred to as verticalization while positioning for the left anterior descending artery and diagonals is referred to as displacement. These positions can be attained by combination of manipulations such as pericardial retraction sutures, slings, and application of various mechanical stabilization devices such as the Maquet mechanical stabilizer, the Maquet access device (Maquet, Wayne, NJ, USA), and Octopus stabilizer systems (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). These manipulations can cause hemodynamic disturbances by compression of chambers, ischemia, and distortion of mitral annular geometry. TEE can monitor patient tolerance to these manipulations in real time.

Conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass

Significant hemodynamic disturbances can occur during OPCABG which may necessitate emergent conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). TEE can predict the impending hemodynamic collapse and facilitate early conversion to CPB. Important predictors are persistent RWMAs, deteriorating global LV function, and significant MR.

Diastolic function

Myocardial ischemia causes various changes in mechanical, hemodynamic, and electrical activities of the heart. RWMAs may worsen or may appear if not existent, upon ischemia during OPCABG. However, the first change that occurs with onset of ischemia is appearance of abnormal relaxation.[6] It actually precedes RWMAs and electrocardiographic, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure changes.[10],[11]

Regional wall motion abnormalities

It is important to assess and detect the new or worsening RWMAs during OPCABG. Intraoperative RWMAs can range from mild hypokinesia to dyskinesias [Figure 2]. Transient hypokinesia in the absence of hemodynamic abnormalities and electrocardiographic changes do not represent significant ischemia. Repositioning the stabilizer or verification of correct placement of intracoronary shunts should be considered when new RWMAs are detected. However, persistent intraoperative akinesia and dyskinesia are associated with myocardial ischemia and postoperative morbidity.[12],[13],[14],[15],[16]
Figure 2: M-mode of the transgastric mid-short-axis view. Yellow arrow indicating severe hypokinesia of mid-inferior segment

Click here to view


New or worsening mitral regurgitation

Appearance of new or worsening MR causing hemodynamic disturbances during OPCABG can be the result of either onset of acute IMR or due to alterations in the mitral annular morphology caused by positioning for grafting, but MR in the latter disappears by reverting to anatomical position of the heart.

Acute IMR is differentiated by the presence of significant RWMAs and hemodynamic abnormalities persisting with normal position of the heart. Direction of MR jet with RWMAs in corresponding segments can also be used to identify graft dysfunction.

Management of hemodynamics during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

TEE can diagnose hemodynamic instabilities during OPCABG caused by hypovolemia, LV systolic dysfunction, diastolic dysfunction, chamber compression, and MR due to positioning or graft dysfunction. These instabilities are managed accordingly by Trendelenburg position, intravenous fluids, positive inotropes, inodilators, vasodilators, diuretics, repositioning the heart, consideration for conversion to CPB, and graft revision. Response to these interventions can be guided by real-time assessment by TEE.


  Assessment After Grafting Top


Systolic function – Global and regional wall motion abnormalities

TEE can help in predicting the results of OPCABG. Immediate improvements in previously dysfunctional segments have been demonstrated after successful grafting.[17],[18] Furthermore, pregrafting compensatory hypercontractile segments have been shown to have normal function immediately after grafting. Persistent akinesia and dyskinesia are associated with adverse clinical outcomes while the absence of these RWMAs has been shown to be related to postoperative course without morbidity.[19]

Postgrafting diastolic function and mitral valve assessment for new or worsening MR should be done to rule out graft dysfunction or global LV dysfunction.

Assessment of the aorta

Postprocedure, it is crucial to evaluate the aorta at the sites of partial clamping, proximal anastomoses, and descending thoracic aorta in the presence of IABP to rule out dissection or intramural hematomas.


  Transesophageal Echocardiography for Vascular Access Top


TEE can be utilized to assist and guide the placement of:

  1. Pulmonary artery catheters [Figure 3]
  2. IABP
  3. Figure 3: Mid-esophageal right ventricular inflow-outflow view. Yellow arrow indicating the pulmonary artery catheter in the right ventricle. LA: Left atrium, RA: Right atrium, TV: Tricuspid valve, RV: Right ventricle, PV: Pulmonary valve, PA: Pulmonary artery, ME: Mid esophageal

    Click here to view


    TEE can be used to identify the need of IABP placement.[20] During IABP placement, it is critical to visualize the passage of the guidewire within the aortic lumen to avoid aortic dissection. Accurate positioning of the IABP tip (2–3 cm below the level of the left subclavian artery) can also be verified [Figure 4]
    Figure 4: Mid-esophageal descending aortic long-axis view. Yellow arrow indicating the presence of intra-aortic balloon in the descending thoracic aorta

    Click here to view


  4. Aortic and venous cannulation during minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery.



  Safety Top


According to multiple studies, risk of complications of TEE varies between 0.6% and 3.5%.[21],[22],[23],[24] However, incidence of major complication such as esophageal perforation is <0.2%.[25],[26] Minor complications such as sore throat and dysphagia are often short lived, and they can be minimized effectively by careful history taking and physical examination to rule out contraindications before insertion. Laryngoscopic insertion, avoidance of excessive manipulation, and reducing the duration of examination also contribute toward minimizing complications.


  Conclusion Top


TEE is an invaluable diagnostic tool for real-time imaging during OPCABG. It is beneficial not only in the intraoperative period but also in the postoperative care units for better patient outcomes.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Fanshawe M, Ellis C, Habib S, Konstadt SN, Reich DL. A retrospective analysis of the costs and benefits related to alterations in cardiac surgery from routine intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. Anesth Analg 2002;95:824-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Savage RM, Lytle BW, Aronson S, Navia JL, Licina M, Stewart WJ, et al. Intraoperative echocardiography is indicated in high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:368-73.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Klein AA, Snell A, Nashef SA, Hall RM, Kneeshaw JD, Arrowsmith JE, et al. The impact of intra-operative transoesophageal echocardiography on cardiac surgical practice. Anaesthesia 2009;64:947-52.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Skinner HJ, Mahmoud A, Uddin A, Mathew T. An investigation into the causes of unexpected intra-operative transoesophageal echocardiography findings. Anaesthesia 2012;67:355-60.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the cardiac imaging committee of the council on clinical cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105:539-42.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Mackensen GB, Heller LB, Aronson S. Assessment of regional ventricular function. In: Savage RM, Aronson S, Shernan SK, editors. Comprehensive Textbook of Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011. p. 168-80.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Aklog L, Filsoufi F, Flores KQ, Chen RH, Cohn LH, Nathan NS, et al. Does coronary artery bypass grafting alone correct moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation? Circulation 2001;104:I68-75.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Kanchuger M, Dolphin E. Assessment of surgery of the aorta. In: Savage RM, Aronson S, Thomas JD, Shernan SK, Shanewise JS, editors. Comprehensive Textbook of Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography. 1st ed. 7 Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2004. p. 569.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Hahn RT, Abraham T, Adams MS, Bruce CJ, Glas KE, Lang RM, et al. Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transesophageal echocardiographic examination: Recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013;26:921-64.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Labovitz AJ, Lewen MK, Kern M, Vandormael M, Deligonal U, Kennedy HL, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction during transient myocardial ischemia produced by angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;10:748-55.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Massie BM, Botvinick EH, Brundage BH, Greenberg B, Shames D, Gelberg H, et al. Relationship of regional myocardial perfusion to segmental wall motion: A physiologic basis for understanding the presence and reversibility of asynergy. Circulation 1978;58:1154-63.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Vatner SF. Correlation between acute reductions in myocardial blood flow and function in conscious dogs. Circ Res 1980;47:201-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Alam M, Khaja F, Brymer J, Marzelli M, Goldstein S. Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular function during coronary artery angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:20-5.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Gewertz BL, Kremser PC, Zarins CK, Smith JS, Ellis JE, Feinstein SB, et al. Transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring of myocardial ischemia during vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg 1987;5:607-13.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Roizen MF, Beaupre PN, Alpert RA, Kremer P, Cahalan MK, Shiller N, et al. Monitoring with two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Comparison of myocardial function in patients undergoing supraceliac, suprarenal-infraceliac, or infrarenal aortic occlusion. J Vasc Surg 1984;1:300-5.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Smith JS, Roizen MF, Cahalan MK, Benefiel DJ, Beaupre PN, Sohn YJ, et al. Does anesthetic technique make a difference? Augmentation of systolic blood pressure during carotid endarterectomy: Effects of phenylephrine versus light anesthesia and of isoflurane versus halothane on the incidence of myocardial ischemia. Anesthesiology 1988;69:846-53.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Koolen JJ, Visser CA, van Wezel HB, Meyne NG, Dunning AJ. Influence of coronary artery bypass surgery on regional left ventricular wall motion: An intraoperative two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Cardiothorac Anesth 1987;1:276-83.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Topol EJ, Weiss JL, Guzman PA, Dorsey-Lima S, Blanck TJ, Humphrey LS, et al. Immediate improvement of dysfunctional myocardial segments after coronary revascularization: Detection by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984;4:1123-34.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Leung JM, O'Kelly B, Browner WS, Tubau J, Hollenberg M, Mangano DT, et al. Prognostic importance of Postbypass regional wall-motion abnormalities in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. SPI research group. Anesthesiology 1989;71:16-25.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Scalia GM, McCarthy PM, Savage RM, Smedira NG, Thomas JD. Clinical utility of echocardiography in the management of implantable ventricular assist devices. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000;13:754-63.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Daniel WG, Erbel R, Kasper W, Visser CA, Engberding R, Sutherland GR, et al. Safety of transesophageal echocardiography. A multicenter survey of 10,419 examinations. Circulation 1991;83:817-21.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Stevenson JG. Incidence of complications in pediatric transesophageal echocardiography: Experience in 1650 cases. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1999;12:527-32.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Kallmeyer IJ, Collard CD, Fox JA, Body SC, Shernan SK. The safety of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography: A case series of 7200 cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2001;92:1126-30.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Piercy M, McNicol L, Dinh DT, Story DA, Smith JA. Major complications related to the use of transesophageal echocardiography in cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009;23:62-5.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Hilberath JN, Oakes DA, Shernan SK, Bulwer BE, D'Ambra MN, Eltzschig HK, et al. Safety of transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010;23:1115-27.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Na S, Kim CS, Kim JY, Cho JS, Kim KJ. Rigid laryngoscope-assisted insertion of transesophageal echocardiography probe reduces oropharyngeal mucosal injury in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2009;110:38-40.  Back to cited text no. 26
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Assessment Befor...
Assessment durin...
Assessment After...
Transesophageal ...
Safety
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed632    
    Printed101    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded200    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]